Linguistics, memory, identities, love

   Love is rebellion, love has no rules. Love is perfect and also love doesnt accept an apology. I don't understand why people are ashamed of love, falling in love or being in love although these days are the time we need to love the most. Human being must be fall in love, sometimes with opposite gender sometimes with same gender, sometimes with trees or with seagull with broken wing, or with the facts, as long as the human loves something, it's okey. İn the other hand, we are always living in fighting each other as humanity. We always torturing each other in order to stisfy our passions or fulfill our beliefs. One day, suddenly we are getting together as all of us, another days we are suddenly braking out and become the enemy as if we've been for years. we are fighting and we broke sometones bones after that we could love each other again. sometimes i cannot understand of contradictions of humanity. However i could understand to behaviours and psychology of the human. at least i can try to make sense of them. Actually, the anger and the love are so closer meaning at all . both love and anger burn and return to their essence. love is fire. anger is cold worse than freezing. but anger could burns you worse than love. Have u ever seen a shepherd in real coral ? Have you ever seen the shepherd's lips in the frost? how to chapped and burned shepherd's lips in the frost, do you know ? anger is ruthless, despite that, the love is pure compassion and mercy. The love infecting your heart and it burns you with yourself. One of Turkey's poet said that, ''the man cannot recognize himself without falling in love. '' Then we need love. sometimes the love mean to be abandon sometimes it could mean to be stoned. from point of me, the love is more enjoyable than any drugs. Love is good. Love could teach u a lot of things, sometimes more than books. ''we were taught to fight. whereas making sex must be taught to us. Because making sex is to resistance against birth of bad things of humanity.We were born late to early deaths.''

   Lets talk about memories and consciousness of human. Memories of human literally is the existence of a representation of something that disappears or it is a representation of something that has happened before and does not exist at the moment. it is enigma actually. but if something left mark on me, it made it important for me. this is the only mark of that thing in my consciousness. After that i can only read the fact of it from this mark which mark has been left on my consciousness.

  According to Freud, human repeats their traumas which are they throw into their inside and suppressed in daily life. people unwittingly do it every day and they are remembering their traumas often unconsciously. despite that, even though u remembered ur traumas during ur experiences, u cannot realise u remembered that, but it could effect ur actions during ur life experiences. they named it compulsive repetition. how much u want to forget ur trauma, it would be repeat in ur deep mind as much as ur effort to forget it.As we continue the act of forgetting, actually we are feeding our traumas which are secretly hidden in one part of in our cconsciousness. Than what does the person have to do to get rid of his/her traumas. First of all they must accept they have a trauma in their mind, either secret one or not. if they get rid of these traumas they need to face these traumas.how can they face these traumas, they need to pick them out from their subconscious (if these are secret traoumas) otherwise from their consciousness. What does it mean? you can manipulate yourself .because identity is fragile. The identity from point of me, mean is existance of you. The identitiy of human might be different means in order to different philosophies. As a result, it is very difficult to be exist like pure yourself at general in the life. i know it because, what if i ask you ''Who are you ? '' and if you have an ability to think, it have to be very difficult question for you . With just one question, you can make people realize that they are living without identities. And just final example about last fact is that, if you started to answering to me after i asked you ''Who are you?'' as im this, im that then you fucked up for sure cause i didnt ask ''What are you?'' ,im asking to you ''Who are you?''

   i want to end up this article with a little political interrogation. According to Paul Ricoeur let's consider the typology of two people. one of them born in france and continues his/her life without knowledge of france culture and manners. and another one were born in syrian and came france and prefered to be french and living with french culture and manners. So why do these people accept the person who born there as french, despite that, why didnt they accept the another person as a part of their community ? According to paul ricoeur if u want to be a part of one community, u should share the story of the community, If we look at the citizenship policy of the countries in general around the world, we will see just two basis in juristictions. one is the citizenship based on ground perception, e.g. USA, in USA to be accepted by american society, it is enough to be born there. İn the other hand, if u want to be part of turkish society, u need to have Turkey's blood to accepted by turkey's society, it mean if u born in turkey, the state doesnt accept you as a turkish citizen also the community of turkey dont accept you as part of them. u need father or mother who are part of turkey's community, it's not important whether kurd or turk. Ricoeur tried to find solutions in this way for social identities with narrative identity. but this is not the answer to the question in the previous paragraph. ''previous paragraph'' i asked to you '' who are you?'' it was questioning of individual identity and at the point of me, i still cannot answer this question.