State, Linguistics part 1

   As a summarize of history of state, according to Sokrates, the main purpose of exist of state not
simply to get physically protection of people. The state also have to provide them ''happiness''. After that i have a question to you, which current state have a main purpose to bring their people to happines around the world right now. include cuba or another good example if we examine them, we ll see that, even better examples such like cuba or something else, those examples have blassed purposes in practice and those purposes important than their people's happiness in general even in the best example cuba.

   If we continue from the Cuban example, we' ll see political fanaticism and society that fears the change. and they stuck out in 1960's in cuba. in the cuban example the state serve for cuban revolution's fetishism and this fetishism blocking cuban people to renew themselves and their systems. i giving this example from cuba cause it is one of the best example of state around the world. i even dont count western states. They just serve for bourgeois. As sokrates said, The state existed for human's happiness.  And where is the state of sokrates, or were there any state like that in the human's history !? Were there any state or any community which is every individuals of community have a same right on the ground of rule. Even when we exemine ancient communities of human's history, unfortunatelly we couldnt find this type of communitie. Even in the ancient greek states, there was direct and total democracy for non-slave men. We' ll see even in ancient greece, there were oppresed figures of their system such like generals of army or political power holders.

   İ can give other more examples from human's history, after that point, i just starting to believe that, classical communism recipe of marx and its practice until right now such like soviets or cuba or more, those are not suitable for human animal(homo sapiens- sapiens). Even the most useful and the most successful government type democracy not functional for provide happiness to the people. At the first times of democracy, it was very good cause there werent billions of people on the earth. And there weren ''mass psychological influence'' tools such like classic media and social media and strict state's education. The capital menages you in europe even we are seeing and we are jeolous of ur democracy from Turkey. Cause we have always been ruled by kinda dictatorship so far and i know another phase of us ll be european fake democracy such like yours. When the time comes, we will be governed by capital instead of dictatorship. and at the point of me, the next step of your democracy ll be the novel '' Brave New World''. no escape from it in this fuckin world.

The main problem of thinker human is linguistics. sometimes, i loving street animal much more than humankind, cause they havent disgusting egos such like human's. And their biggest selfisness starting with eating or sex. Basiclly they are very simply living beings and you can predict their action before they do and you know if they barking at you, they are either hungery or they want you gone. Everything started with thinking for human being. The human being started to killing themselves and ruining the world with the beginning of thinking. these thoughts formed the information. And these infos saved on books or another materials.The mankind didnt satisfied with those, the human keep continue to thinking and asking and always the human always want more. always. The human found the name to unanswered questions as ''philosophy''. And philosophy fucked the mother of this world and people cause the humans started to find answers to unanswered questions with linguistics. there were fake answers. The humans were train very skilled linguistic performers. And they took the name of philosophers or prophets or marx or apo. At the point of me , all of problems such like philosophy, ideology or religions are just problems of linguistic. For example they took the name of philisopers, it is wrong. Philosophers giving their own answer with their linguistics to unanswered questions. the truth is to be thinker, the thinkers just searching to find unanswered questions and they give unanswered questions to rational science or public opinion. What if thinkers trying to find solution or answer for unanswered question they become to philosophers and philisophers are just linguistic performers. Another distinction between thinkers and philisophers is that, the philisophers giving you philisophicaly truth in the other hand thinkers just have a theorical answers. Another actual problem of linguistic that, entellectual and cultured distinction. Some of people ,they are equipped themselves with continuous information and they just trying to manipulate and affect you for their egos. They giving you answer or solution from books or from their ideologies but not from their mind neither their own thought. The true type is to be cultured, they are trying to be neutral during debates and they trying to understand the community or individual for giving beneficial answer to them. Another important featureof them is the visibility. they can broke all of ideological or philosophical dogmas with ability of visibility.

Actually all of last phrase just linguistic.You can't categorize people precisely. there arent any rational method for it in the realty.